QUANTUM GAME THEORY

QUANTUM GAME THEORY

by

a small green plant sprouts from a branch

QUANTUM GAME THEORY

Game theory is a branch of mathematics and strategic modelling that analyses how rational participants (players) make decisions when the outcome depends on the actions of others. It acts as the “science of strategy,” predicting behaviours in competitive situations across economics, psychology, and business. It identifies optimal strategies where no player can benefit by changing their action alone.

Key Concepts of Game Theory:

  • Players: The decision-makers, such as individuals, companies, or nations.
  • Strategies: The complete set of actions available to a player.
  • Payoffs: The rewards or penalties (e.g., profit, utility) resulting from a specific combination of strategies.
  • Nash Equilibrium: A stable state where no player has an incentive to deviate from their chosen strategy after considering an opponent’s choice.
  • Dominant Strategy: A strategy that is better for a player than any other, regardless of what the other player does.

Types of Games:

  • Zero-Sum vs. Non-Zero-Sum: In zero-sum games, one player’s gain is exactly equal to the other’s loss. In non-zero-sum games, players can win together or lose together.
  • Cooperative vs. Non-Cooperative: Whether players can negotiate binding contracts (cooperative) or must act independently (non-cooperative).
  • Simultaneous vs. Sequential: Whether players act at the same time or in turn

Real-World Applications:

Game theory is used to model competitive situations, such as price wars between firms, auction bidding, diplomatic negotiations, and environmental treaties.

The Nash Equilibrium

You have 3 options to get from one continent to another one across a sea.

Option 01

Journey time 2 days:

Depart location A, take a car, then train, then boat then train then car to get to destination B?

Option 02.

Journey time 1 day:

Depart location A, take a boat, then a train and then a coach to your destination B?

Option 03

Journey time 4 hours:

Resort location A, take an airplane and land at destination B?

The choice you most likely make is the last option choice, because it’s the most convenient and easiest route. This is an example of the Nash equilibrium. It’s where you trade off against your other options and most people take the easiest route.

It’s also based upon the options you have when interacting with other people or systems. So the options are:

  1. You win, they lose.
  2. They win, you lose.
  3. Nobody wins – lose, lose.
  4. Everyone wins – Win, win.

Of course, the term “win” and “lose” are relative to the aims and objectives, but also the psychology of each player or players. A win could be a psychological victory and so not necessarily a combat scenario but can include combat situations too.

Quantum Physics

The 4-option end of game formula also applies to quantum physics because you have a similar set of guiding options.

There is the Positive

There is the Negative

There is the Neutral

Which then provides you with 3 options initially but then opens up more than just 3 options. Also bearing in mind that you as the creator and observer have power over the neutral which governs both positive and negative equally.

This then allows for the following:

 ⁃ Neutral Positive

 ⁃ Neutral Negative

 ⁃ Neutral Neutral (neither positive nor negative included)

So, you can respond with a neutral that has positive consequences.

Or you can respond with a neutral that has negative consequences, for example.

Not only that, but one is able to see a positive or a negative aspect to any given thing or person, as being the neutral observer of positive and negative potentials.

The Neutral Observer

So just as in quantum entanglement and quantum physics you are the observer as neutral and depending on how you observe will depend on whether something is more positive or neutral to you or from you to others.

Most people are not aware of themselves being the third neutral observer in the middle of both positive and negative and tend to be a pin sliding on the scale of just positive and negative only. They are not aware of their neutral point of perspective being the influence point making something more positive or negative as they do not see it is them that is the valuer of whatever they perceive. They can only see something as a good or a bad thing and never as having aspects of both to it. Where they are the observer and arbitrator of something and its value positively or negatively to them. All of nature is neutral. When you water your garden it doesn’t just choose to feed only the flowers, it feeds the weeds too. So you are that third neutral space that then decides there are only 2 options for you when there are always 3. And YOU being that filter of both but also controlling both. A neutral space gives you the option to not entangle in either the positive or negative sides.

You are the:

 ⁃ Creator

 ⁃ Observer

 ⁃ Receiver

So in that place of superposition, of you being all of the three existing states, you can choose to place your awareness or choose to become conscious of each of those three aspects. Often, we will create a situation based on how we react to something. The situation created by our own reactions and responses then generates a consequence that we also become aware of. Yet many who are in a binary mindset will not see their own participation in the unfolding event from their reactions or responses.

So, in effect you are taught to think there is only good and evil, positive and negative, you have not been taught that there is always a 3rd option for you, the neutral space between positive and negative.

The neutral space governs both positive and negative but also can stand alone as a place that excuses both negative and positive choices, you can observe both extremes but not be entangled into them in the neutral space.

The issue I have with just “Game Theory” on its own is “who” gets to decide:

  1. What a “win” is?
  2. What a “lose” is?
  3. Who gets to decide the above winner/s or lower/s?

It is not a simple case of the “winner” having stopped the other opponent/s or player/s, because it could be the “win” or “lost” narrative is just another game “tactic” to deceive the other side/s.

Take for example WW2, where the Nazi’s won the war and as part of their victory over the opponents, they just moved their base of operations to South America and Base 211 in Antarctica. From there they defeated admiral Byrd’s armada and infiltrated governments along with superior antigravity and energy weapon technologies. So the tactic of making the world believe they had lost by using the propaganda of the opposition to control the populations of many infiltrated governments around the planet. So my point is that in arguments with people who are not very intelligent, you can let them walk away thinking that they have gained a win or a victory and in fact it is you who have played them, because it means that you are no longer debating the subject with a stupid person.

So this means that a win is not necessarily a win and a loss is not necessarily a loss. It’s the perception of the players that make it what it is, and arguably the true winner is the one that achieves their own objectives.

Which may be to fool others into a false victory, or a false loss. This is the quantum aspect to Game Theory that does not allow for the deception of false perception.

So, Game Theory gives you 4 options, you win or lose, everyone wins or loses, but these 4 outcomes are based on a collective agreement that those are the final outcomes.

You as an individual have 3 options, to agree to something, either for or against your will. To disagree with something for or against your will, or to neither agree or disagree. To say yes or no, but also not agree or disagree either.

So a “Win” or a “Lose” is only if you agree to them. You can choose to see neither a win nor a loss too.

So, in quantum Game Theory, you are all 3 states at the same time. It is only your own agreement and response that makes the outcome a “win” or “lose” situation with others and arguably stepping away from conflict where the combatants think they have won against you is a win for you, because they are no longer in conflict with you. It’s a question of how something is perceived by the perceiver in their subjective reality that makes it what it is. And not necessarily the same as what it was at the time.

💖🙏🌟

ENLIGHTENMENT IRONY

ENLIGHTENMENT IRONY

by

a small green plant sprouts from a branch

ENLIGHTENMENT IRONY

When someone says to you “I’ve become enlightened”, the first automatic thought that comes to mind is – “People who think they are enlightened are not enlightened”. Am I correct that this was your own thinking too?

People in the land of tomatoes just pick them off the vine. They are fine. They live in a land of no potatoes or root vegetables and don’t know what roots are, because they only know tomatoes and fruits off the ground. So when someone comes along talking about tubers, roots, potatoes and things growing underground, they will call that person crazy, and potatoes don’t exist to them. Especially as you cannot see one.

The same is true for “enlightenment” because the man knows potatoes exist as he’s eaten and grown them personally on another island where they had both tomatoes and potatoes.

So, when he says he’s “enlightened” it has been his own personal experience of discovery and self-realisation.

Something that has not been experienced or realised in the minds of those he’s speaking with, who only will know about tomatoes and regard potatoes as a mythical tale but not ever real.

So, when you think you have become enlightened, it’s ok to feel as if you have in your own subjective unique personal experiential way of living life and understanding yourself well from that process and then becoming “self-aware” and self-realised you are self-aware.

Telling people you have attained this state of elevated frequency of consciousness to people who have not done their inner work, who are hypnotised mind slaves of the general public, is not going to be understood by them. It is like a military jet pilot trying to explain flying a plane to a caveman. They just won’t have any comprehension of what you are talking about.

Most of the cavemen will scoff at your potato tales and laugh at you for talking potatoes. They will think you have ideas above your station, that you think that you are the big “I am” and better than people who eat tomatoes. There could even be an anti-potatoist movement backlash against you for any potato talk. It could upset the economy of the tomato growers.

So, explaining your own personal self-discovery and growth, all that lived experience and life learning, all those lessons and knowledge is lost on someone who’s not done it. They will just assume and suppose what their own belief system and state hypnotism tells them to think and reply with a standard programmed reply and denial of your info or experiences as being false to them.

A lower vibe person cannot know a higher vibe experience. A lower intelligence person cannot understand higher vibe more intelligent information or make connections that bring more understanding to them. Lower vibe people are within collectivism trolling and so telling them you’re an individual won’t make any difference to them, as for them it has not been experienced.

So of course, when you tell people you’ve become enlightened, you are talking to people who are un-enlightened and still very much in the dark. They cannot talk, think or know what an enlightened person is. All they can do is suppose they know what is not enlightenment.

Asking a tomato eater on tomatoes island to say what they think they know about potatoes or people who grow and eat mythical potatoes is not going to get them to know what a real potato is. They will just say what they think it is and will have never tasted one. But they feel arrogant enough to comment that you can’t ever possibly be a potato person. They think you just think you’ve experienced potato, but that you’re mistaken.

So, telling un-enlightened people that you think you’ve become enlightened will get the tomato response from only tomato people who think that potato’s don’t exist. As they have never had a potato experience, yet think they know they can speak on enlightenment enough to know who is or isn’t, just because someone says it.

So, is enlightenment a classification given to you by others? Is it only a status applied to you by others? A socially agreed status that only others can assign to you?

Or is enlightenment a personal journey that only you can experience and know? Is it such a uniquely individual process that has no particular boundary markers to denote where you are in your learning journey? Therefore, nothing to compare against or measure accurately?

It is the latter of the two. Yes, you may get people assigning a status of enlightened or not to you on a social cultural level, but it is not an attribute for someone else to give you. It is only ever self-realised. Even then it is something that you arrive at rather than assign to yourself. Enlightenment is a place you realise you’ve reached kinda only after you have reached it and it has informed you. So, it’s not something you anoint or appoint to yourself as like a role. It’s more a realisation you have reached that mind-space rather than knowing you have at first. Then you realise that’s what it is and then from that will have to admit to yourself that is what it could be. You then hold on to that and look at references to what you are experiencing, and each time you find that these are the same profound internal changes that people have called “enlightenment” in the past. It’s a state of the mind that has more light within it than the average mind does.

It’s more of a biological process of many routes, it’s only ever self-realised.

So this is why an average person can come up with a programmed reply “if he thinks he’s enlightened, then he’s not”, because it’s from the mind that’s not enlightened but arrogant enough to think it knows who is and who isn’t. It’s not even their own opinion, it’s a script they learned to repeat.

This is deliberate, it’s social engineering of culture to keep everyone average, the same as the rest of the herd. You cannot be allowed to be different and improved by those who do not do their own inner work or improve themselves.

No, you have to be pulled down to the rest of the crowd, because if you think you are something special then that means that you are dangerous to the average mind slaves and they will want to stop you from being unique. This is the way the matrix makes people think they are not divine or special or unique. This is the way they control the herd from seeing the ones who free themselves of the herd. This is the way they teach the herd to be ignorant of the ones who can free the herd. Calling the ones on the other side of the prison in their open landscape as crazy. This is designed to stop you reaching enlightenment by your own will and wits.

Never be discouraged or put off from thinking you may be enlightened, or that you think you are becoming enlightened, and never succumb to the brainwashed tomato minds of the tomato people living in their tomato matrix soup world. Don’t let them deny your illuminated divine multi root vegetable-ness.

💖🙏🌟

THE QUANTUM TUNNELLING EFFECT

THE QUANTUM TUNNELLING EFFECT

by

a small green plant sprouts from a branch

THE QUANTUM TUNNELLING EFFECT

Forwards & Reverse (Time Travel)

If you control the way people understand and perceive the past, you can control the present. If you can control the present, you can control the future.

Quantum physics says that the present can affect the past and even the future can affect the present too. Here are two real-world examples of the forwards and reverse effect.

The “Reverse” Quantum Tunnel Effect

The reverse is also true- By finding out information in the present that you did not know in the past, it can affect the way you understand the past events, and therefore change their context and meaning in the present. Which then changes your behaviour or perception of the present and so influences your future decisions.

Quantum Tunnelling in Physics

Is a quantum mechanical phenomenon where subatomic particles (like electrons or protons) pass through energy barriers they classically shouldn’t be able to cross. Due to their wave-like nature and probabilistic position, particles can “tunnel” through, rather than go over, a barrier, with a small probability of reappearing on the other side. 

Non-Locality & Time Travel

As no particular atom is in one particular position but in potential position (super-position), which means its exact position in time and space is only relative to the observer of it. In the observation being able to change what is being observed. This repeatable scientific experiment explains that because there is no here, or there, and that all is local to your access of it, means that time travel is possible. It is possible because time is within the unified Source field, a consequence of our minds processing in subsequent frames of understanding, so sequential state of perception making duration in mind. So time and space are fluid and the past is inseparable from the future, as is the present now. They are all attributes of the one unified aspect of Source.

💖🙏🌟

THE VATICAN IS HIDING THEM

THE VATICAN IS HIDING THEM

by

a small green plant sprouts from a branch

THE VATICAN IS HIDING THEM

The Catholic Church has been hiding, covering, concealing, obscuring, removing evidence, tampering with evidence, destroying evidence, misinforming the public, deceiving its worshippers and lying since its beginnings. It has known about the presence of extraterrestrials since its inception at the end of the Roman Empire. Whole rooms are dedicated to specific extraterrestrials and documenting them or collecting items from them. The reason being that that extraterrestrials had infiltrated Rome, so when the Catholic religion was created, it became a powerful organisation that was already being controlled by the regressive extraterrestrials. They had already infiltrated humanity 1000’s of years prior with alien/human hybrids indistinguishable from any normal human. So, when humanity realises that all the main religions have been created to control people’s minds, then humanity will have a better and more realistic perspective on what is true and what isn’t.

God, Source, Spirit, the Creation, exists yes but not the man-made or ET-made mind control hive type of god.

The regressives come from Orion and Saturn, they brought their symbols to Earth. The Ankh, Eye of Horus, computer chip circuit, pyramids, crystal skulls, Anubis, Greys, scarab beetle, Star maps, DNA double helix and more. All found on artefacts dating back 40,000 years or more.

All these UFO and Alien investigators, religious and spiritual people are speculating or making stuff up based on what ai tells them. Or what they can gain from a moment of limelight from being in the presence of the artefact, holding it in wonder, singing to it and spouting rubbish about consciousness and mystical realms. I do wonder if they cannot see themselves as repeating the worship or crucify loops.

The Vatican has been organised by malevolent extraterrestrials from the start. So to say they know from thinking it’s a human organisation covering for ETs when in fact it’s been an ET Mind Control racket from the start .They used humans and human hybrids to make you think it’s a human religion based off the “word” of god.

This is one of the reasons that disclosure will disrupt mainstream religions and society when humanity finds out all the main religions are just various brands of mind control initiatives.

It’s not for me to say do or don’t believe, do or don’t have faith, do or don’t worship a supreme being or nature etc. I’m just pointing out why Star Family are reluctant to go public. For reasons above you would worship or crucify them, but also other enemy or controlling regressive malevolent ET rivals would try to capture you and prevent you from disclosing you are not of Earth. Religions would collapse, not from good ETs saying about religion being false and for mind control, but because all those religions being shown to be false would send people into ontological shock and sadden them deeply going from one extreme belief to the opposing and thinking there is no god. Which is also not true, because there is a divine supreme creation that is still generating and creating you in this moment. So, the god or Source part still holds true, it’s just the man-made versions will prove to be false.

God’s light shines eternally within.

💖🙏🌟